N. Brunello et al., NEW INSIGHTS INTO THE BIOLOGY OF SCHIZOPHRENIA THROUGH THE MECHANISM OF ACTION OF CLOZAPINE, Neuropsychopharmacology, 13(3), 1995, pp. 177-213
Many studies have detected in the brain of schizophrenic patients vari
ous morphological and structural abnormalities in various regions and
in particular in the cortical and limbic areas. These abnormalities mi
ght in part result from neurodevelopmental disturbances suggesting tha
t schizophrenia might have organic causes. These abnormalities may be
the primary event in schizophrenia and be responsible for altered dopa
minergic, but not only dopaminergic, neurotransmission in these region
s. If schizophrenia is in some way strictly related to brain morpholog
ical abnormalities it becomes hard to believe that a curative treatmen
t will ever be possible. Considering this scenario, treatment of schiz
ophrenia will be restricted to symptomatic and preventive therapy and
therefore, more effective and better tolerated antipsychotics are nece
ssary. The widely used classical antipsychotic drugs present some disa
dvantages. They do not improve all symptoms of schizophrenia, are nor
effective in all patients, produce a number of unpleasant and serious,
and partly irreversible, motor side effects. The atypical antipsychot
ic clozapine constitutes a major advance in particular for patients no
r responding to conventional neuroleptics. To explain the unique thera
peutic effect of clozapine many hypotheses have been proposed. Most of
the explanations given so far assume that the D-2 blockade is the bas
is for the antipsychotic activity of clozapine and that the difference
in respect to other antipsychotics is due to the contribution of othe
r receptor interactions. Considering the dopaminergic receptor in part
icular the recently discovered D-4 receptor subtype, it has been obser
ved that even if several classical neuroleptics exhibit high affinity
to the D-4 receptor, clozapine is more selective for this subtype comp
ared to D-2 receptors. Moreover clozapine, differently from all other
conventional neuroleptics, is a mixed but weak D-1/D-2 antagonist. Thi
s observation has prompted speculation that the synergism between D-1
and D-2 receptors might allow antipsychotic effects to be achieved bel
ow the threshold for unwanted motor side effects. Probably the D-1 ant
agonistic activity exerted by clozapine at low doses enhances preferen
tially the extracellular concentration of dopamine in specific areas o
f the brain, such as the prefrontal cortex, where a dopaminergic hypoa
ctivity has been suggested to be in part responsible for negative symp
toms of schizophrenia. The clozapine enhancement of dopaminergic activ
ity in this brain area might explain its efficacy against schizophreni
a negative symptoms. However, it cannot be excluded that the affinitie
s displayed by clozapine for other nondopaminergic receptors also cont
ribute to its unique therapeutic profile. The various hypotheses menti
oned in this review need to be further validated or disproved. The onl
y way to do that is developing new drugs where the postulated mechanis
tic profile is specifically realized and to clinically test these comp
ounds.