VARIATION AMONG AND WITHIN MOUNTAIN BIRCH TREES IN FOLIAGE PHENOLS, CARBOHYDRATES, AND AMINO-ACIDS, AND IN GROWTH OF EPIRRITA-AUTUMNATA LARVAE

Citation
J. Suomela et al., VARIATION AMONG AND WITHIN MOUNTAIN BIRCH TREES IN FOLIAGE PHENOLS, CARBOHYDRATES, AND AMINO-ACIDS, AND IN GROWTH OF EPIRRITA-AUTUMNATA LARVAE, Journal of chemical ecology, 21(10), 1995, pp. 1421-1446
Citations number
81
Categorie Soggetti
Ecology,Biology
Journal title
ISSN journal
00980331
Volume
21
Issue
10
Year of publication
1995
Pages
1421 - 1446
Database
ISI
SICI code
0098-0331(1995)21:10<1421:VAAWMB>2.0.ZU;2-H
Abstract
Leaf quality of the mountain birch (Betula pubescens ssp. tortuosa) fo r herbivores was studied at several hierarchical levels: among trees, among ramets within trees, among branches within ramets, and among sho rt shoots within branches. The experimental units at each level were c hosen randomly. The indices of leaf quality were the growth rate of th e larvae of a geometrid, Epirrita autumnata, and certain biochemical t raits of the leaves (total phenolics and individual phenolic compounds , total carbohydrates and individual sugars, free and protein-bound am ino acids). We also discuss relationships between larval growth rate a nd biochemical foliage traits. Larval growth rates during two successi ve years correlated positively at the level of tree, the ramet, and th e branch, indicating that the relationships in leaf quality remained c onstant between seasons both among and within trees. The distribution of variation at different hierarchical levels depended on the trait in question. In the case of larval growth rate, ramets and short shoots accounted for most of the explained variation. In the case of biochemi cal compounds, trees accounted for most of the variance in the content of total phenolics and individual low-molecular-weight phenolics. In the content of carbohydrates (total carbohydrates, starch, fructose, g lucose, and sucrose) and amino acids, variation among branches was gen erally larger than variation among trees. Variation among ramets was l ow for most compounds. No single leaf trait played a paramount role in larval growth. Secondary compounds, represented by phenolic compounds , or primary metabolites, particularly sugars, may both be important i n determining the suitability of birch leaves for larvae. If phenols a re causally more important, genet-specific analyses of foliage chemist ry are needed. If sugars are of primary importance, within-genet sampl ing and analysis of foliage chemistry are necessary.