THE ABILITY OF CHEMICAL-EXTRACTION METHODS TO ESTIMATE PLANE-AVAILABLE SOIL P AND A BETTER UNDERSTANDING OF P AVAILABILITY OF FERTILIZED ANDOSOLS BY USING ISOTOPIC METHODS
N. Kato et al., THE ABILITY OF CHEMICAL-EXTRACTION METHODS TO ESTIMATE PLANE-AVAILABLE SOIL P AND A BETTER UNDERSTANDING OF P AVAILABILITY OF FERTILIZED ANDOSOLS BY USING ISOTOPIC METHODS, Soil Science and Plant Nutrition, 41(4), 1995, pp. 781-789
Plant-available P content in soils differing in P fertilization histor
y was determined by both the isotopic dilution method (pot experiment)
and isotopic exchange method (laboratory test) using phosphate ions l
abelled with P-32 in order to evaluate the residual effect of P fertil
izers applied to the soils. Another isotopic technique was also used t
o evaluate the ability of chemical extractions, Truog and Bray No. 2 m
ethods, to extract plant-available soil P. Four soil samples of a Humi
c Andosol taken from experimental plots, which did not receive fertili
zer (J1 treatment), or received a readily soluble fertilizer (RSF) (J2
treatment), RSF plus a fused magnesium phosphate (FMP) (J3 treatment)
, and RSF plus Florida phosphate rock (J4 treatment), were analyzed. I
n a pot experiment, maize (Zea mays) was grown on the soils where avai
lable P was labelled with P-32. P uptake and specific radioactivity in
shoot were measured. The fraction of P in plant derived from fertiliz
er (%Pdff in plant) and pool size of isotopically exchangeable soil P
(L-value) were determined. P uptake increased in the order: J1 < J2 =
J4 < J3. The L-value became larger in the order, J1 = J2 < J4 < J3. Th
e highest value of %Pdff in plant was also observed in treatment J3. M
ore than 50% of P in the applied FMP remained in the soil as isotopica
lly exchangeable P. Three parameters of soil P status, intensity, quan
tity, and capacity factors, were examined by a laboratory test using t
he isotopic exchange method. Quantity factor, which expresses the amou
nt of isotopically exchangeable soil P (E(1)-value), was highest in th
e J3 treatment, followed by the J4, J2, J1 treatments. These results a
greed with the results of P uptake and L-value. The P availability of
the J4 soil measured by the Truog and Bray No. 2 methods was higher th
an that of the J3 soil. These data were not in agreement with plant gr
owth and P uptake. It was found by another isotopic approach that not
only plant-available P but also unavailable P was extracted from the s
oils by the Bray No. 2 method. The Truog method also overestimated ava
ilable P in the soils amended with P fertilizers but gave an accurate
result for the unfertilized soil.