CORRELATION OF PREOPERATIVE NEURORADIOLOG ICAL DIAGNOSIS WITH POSTOPERATIVE HISTOLOGICAL DIAGNOSIS IN PATHOLOGICAL INTRACRANIAL PROCESSES

Citation
T. Hagen et al., CORRELATION OF PREOPERATIVE NEURORADIOLOG ICAL DIAGNOSIS WITH POSTOPERATIVE HISTOLOGICAL DIAGNOSIS IN PATHOLOGICAL INTRACRANIAL PROCESSES, Radiologe, 35(11), 1995, pp. 808-815
Citations number
13
Categorie Soggetti
Radiology,Nuclear Medicine & Medical Imaging
Journal title
ISSN journal
0033832X
Volume
35
Issue
11
Year of publication
1995
Pages
808 - 815
Database
ISI
SICI code
0033-832X(1995)35:11<808:COPNID>2.0.ZU;2-P
Abstract
Purpose: To determine the accuracy of preoperative neuroradiological d iagnosis of pathological intracranial processes in a prospective study . Material and Method: A team of three neuroradiologists determined th e diagnosis in CT, MR and angiography prior to stereotactic biopsy or operative resection (173 patients). Only one diagnosis was allowed, ex cept in those cases with two equally probable diagnosis (24 patients). In 106 patients a resection of a brain tumor, in 67 cases a stereotac tic biopsy was performed. According to the histological diagnosis the patients were subdivided into three groups: 1: complete agreement: the single diagnosis was correct. 2: conditional agreement: one of the 2 differential diagnosis was correct. 3: no agreement Results: In 131 ca ses (76 %) a com plete agreement, in 24 cases (14%) a conditional agre ement and in 18 patients (10 %) no agreement were found. Assuming only stereotactic procedures the neuroradiological diagnosis was correct i n 44 cases (66 %) and incorrect in 10 cases (15 %). In 13 patients (19 %) one of the two differential diagnosis was correct. The specificity of the major tumors was calculated between 92 % and 100 %. The sensit ivity for pituitary adenomas (n = 9) and neurinomas (n = 11) was 100 % , the sensitivity for meningiomas (n = 32) was 94 %. A sensitivity was calculated between 50 % and 71 % for astrocytomas (WHO I to WHO IV, n = 64) and metastases (n = 24). Conclusion: The accuracy was found to be higher than in the comparable retrospective studies.