K. Muller, CHANGES ON THE BORDERLINES BETWEEN RESEARCH AND INDUSTRY FOLLOWING ECONOMIC TRANSFORMATION IN THE CZECH-REPUBLIC, Social studies of science, 25(4), 1995, pp. 805-828
Citations number
14
Categorie Soggetti
History & Philosophy of Sciences","History & Philosophy of Sciences","History & Philosophy of Sciences
This paper presents the results of comparative empirical research on t
he emergence of new institutional arrangements on what we might call t
he 'borderlines between research and industry: in the context (especia
lly) of radical economic liberalization in the Czech Republic. The res
earch focused on creative links between academic and industrial resear
ch, the exploitation of research by industry, and the growth of new in
termediary institutions between these two spheres. The paper analyzes
the potential for such developments by looking at the institutional sh
aping of different sectors of the research system, in the environment
of centralist regulatory practices before 1989, and their de-instituti
onalization following radical economic reform in the early 1990s. The
latter process has had a mobilizing effect, prompting (among other thi
ngs) a number of local 'bottom-up' initiatives - which, in various way
s, promise to enhance links between research and industry - in respons
e to pressures on the research system. Three exemplary cases are descr
ibed (from industrial, academy and university research respectively) i
n order to illustrate both the opportunities and the limits to such de
velopments. It is argued in conclusion that additional, 'top-down' eff
orts are required if this potential is to be fully realized.