LIMITS ON THE APPLICATION OF ADDITIVE FACTORS LOGIC - VIOLATIONS OF STAGE ROBUSTNESS SUGGEST A DUAL-PROCESS ARCHITECTURE TO EXPLAIN FLANKEREFFECTS ON TARGET PROCESSING
Kr. Ridderinkhof et al., LIMITS ON THE APPLICATION OF ADDITIVE FACTORS LOGIC - VIOLATIONS OF STAGE ROBUSTNESS SUGGEST A DUAL-PROCESS ARCHITECTURE TO EXPLAIN FLANKEREFFECTS ON TARGET PROCESSING, Acta psychologica, 90(1-3), 1995, pp. 29-48
This study aimed to establish whether the logic of the AFM applies whe
n multielement stimuli contain relevant and irrelevant elements. Targe
t Size (TS) and symbolic S-R Compatibility (SRC) were manipulated in t
hree reaction time (RT) experiments. TS and SRC are assumed in the AFM
literature to selectively influence the independent stages of feature
extraction and S-R translation, respectively. Experiment 1 showed tha
t the effects of TS and SRC on RT were additive when the target was pr
esented in isolation and this additive relation was not changed when t
he target was flanked by stimuli that contained no information relevan
t to the response. In Experiment 2, this additivity changed into a sup
eradditive interaction when flankers signaled the same response as the
target: The effect of SRC was larger when targets were small rather t
han large. The overall pattern of findings violated the AFM stage robu
stness criterion. Neither a discrete stage model nor a continuous flow
conception account for the results. To explain flanker effects on tar
get processing a dual-process architecture was formulated that assumes
that perceptual information is processed along concurrently engaged r
outes: An attentive processing route and a direct priming route. Exper
iment 3 confirmed the prediction of the dual-process model that the re
lation between TS and SRC would be subadditive when flankers signal th
e response opposite to that designated by the target.