COMPARISON BETWEEN FLOW CYTOMETRIC AND CYTOGENETIC TUMOR-CELL DNA CONTENT USING A SIMPLE FLOW SAMPLE PREPARATION METHOD - PLOIDY COMPARISONOF 86 FRESH PEDIATRIC TUMORS
D. Zwick et al., COMPARISON BETWEEN FLOW CYTOMETRIC AND CYTOGENETIC TUMOR-CELL DNA CONTENT USING A SIMPLE FLOW SAMPLE PREPARATION METHOD - PLOIDY COMPARISONOF 86 FRESH PEDIATRIC TUMORS, PEDIATRIC PATHOLOGY & LABORATORY MEDICINE, 15(6), 1995, pp. 845-856
A comparison of tumor ploidy by flow cytometry (FL) and cytogenetics (
CYG) was made in 86 fresh pediatric solid (n = 47) and hematopoietic (
n = 39) tumors using simple sampling and semiautomated proprietary FL
preparation methods and defined histogram interpretive criteria. Tumor
karyotypes with 44-48 chromosomes were regarded as CYG diploid and ot
her chromosomal complements CYG aneuploid for comparison purposes. Ave
histograms were uninterpretable and nine cases failed to produce 15 o
r more metaphases for karyotyping: Mean G0/G1 peak coefficients of var
iation of all 86 cases were 2.7 and 3.0 for the diploid and aneuploid
populations, respectively. Of the 72 eligible cases, 41 were concordan
t diploid and IG concordant aneuploid with an overall concordance of 7
9 %. The DNA Index and karyotypic index correlation coefficient was 0.
92 for the 16 concordant aneuploid cases. Analysis of the 15 discordan
t cases highlights the limitations of both methods and of the histogra
m interpretive criteria and indicates that FL is probably more sensiti
ve for detection of tumor aneuploidy as defined and detected by these
methods.