ESTIMATION OF ESTROGEN-RECEPTOR CONTENT IN FINE-NEEDLE ASPIRATES FROMBREAST-CANCER USING THE MONOCLONAL-ANTIBODY 1D5 AND MICROWAVE-OVEN PROCESSING - CORRELATION WITH PARAFFIN-EMBEDDED AND FROZEN-SECTIONS DETERMINATIONS
Fc. Schmitt et al., ESTIMATION OF ESTROGEN-RECEPTOR CONTENT IN FINE-NEEDLE ASPIRATES FROMBREAST-CANCER USING THE MONOCLONAL-ANTIBODY 1D5 AND MICROWAVE-OVEN PROCESSING - CORRELATION WITH PARAFFIN-EMBEDDED AND FROZEN-SECTIONS DETERMINATIONS, Diagnostic cytopathology, 13(4), 1995, pp. 347-351
We describe a method of immunocytochemically assessing estrogen recept
or (ER) status on alcohol-fixed smears obtained by fine-needle aspirat
ion (FNA)from breast cancer patients, using a commercially available m
onoclonal antibody (1D5) with microwave oven processing. A series of 3
1 cases of aspirates from breast cancer were analysed and the results
were compared with assessment by ER immunocytochemical assay using the
same procedure on formalin-fixed tissue and with assessment by ER-ICA
assay on frozen sections. The results were scored semiquantitatively
using a five grade scoring system. Of the 31 cases examined, 21 were p
ositive at least by two methods and 10 were negative for all three det
erminations. The results obtained in the ER immunocytochemical assay o
n aspirates and paraffin-sections using the antibody 1D5 and those obt
ained on frozen sections using the antibody H222 were closely similar.
In only one case was it not possible to interpret the reaction in the
cytological specimen because there was a strong background in the sme
ar. In general, we obtained more intense positivity with the antibody
1D5 in aspirates and formalin-fixed material than with the antibody H2
22 in frozen sections. The scoring results of the three methods were a
lmost identical. We conclude that the application of ER method on alco
hol-fixed smears will eliminate the need for using a special fixation
procedure and will provide several advantages, such as: improvement in
morphological concomitant analysis, utilization whenever malignancy i
s found without necessity to re-aspirate the patient, and adequacy of
archival material. (C) 1995 Wiley-Liss, Inc.