Ac. Conway et al., PARTNERING WITH PHYSICIANS TO ACHIEVE QUALITY IMPROVEMENT, The Joint Commission journal on quality improvement, 21(11), 1995, pp. 619-626
Background: The Main Medical Assessment Foundation (MMAF) has successf
ully involved hundreds of Main physicians in study groups to analyze d
ata on small-area variation and assess physician decision-making patte
rns. In 1991 the MMAF model was replicated across a tri-state area (Ma
in, New Hampshire, Vermont) in an effort called the Outcomes Dissemina
tion Project, which is funded by a five-year grant from the U.S. Agenc
y for Health Care Policy and Research. The Outcomes Dissemination Proj
ect: Five specialty study groups, each meeting three times a year, exa
mine local and national utilization data, examine guidelines and resea
rch findings, participate in outcomes studies and patient education, a
nd disseminate their findings through specialty society presentations
and other feedback efforts. The MMAF study group process is based on t
he beliefs that medicine is a subculture with a complex set of profess
ional values, beliefs, socialization processes, and norms, and that qu
alify improvement efforts work best when they are nonpunitive and educ
ational. Issues in obtaining physician involvement: (1) Physicians are
willing to change their practices if they are brought into a cultural
ly appropriate improvement program. (2) Related specialties (for examp
le, internists and family practitioners) can often work together effec
tively on issues of common interest (3) Involving respected clinical l
eaders has helped establish the legitimacy of MMAF methods among physi
cians. (4) Area- and physicians-specific data are not made public, so
as to build a sense of confidentiality among participants. Conclusions
: The project continues to function as a powerful education process an
d serves as a model for replication elsewhere.