In recent years Richard Rorty has sought to develop an alternative to
the familiar rationalist and natural rights ''vocabularies'' of libera
lism. Unlike most critics of classical liberalism, however, Rorty esch
ews attempts to argue against these vocabularies, and instead seeks to
persuade his readers by redescribing the aspirations of a liberal soc
iety in a more ''attractive'' way. I assess Rorty's redescriptive prac
tice through an analysis of his ideal liberal polity. I contend that a
lthough Rorty defends redescription as an alternative to ''normal'' ph
ilosophical and theoretical argument, his redescriptive efforts fail o
n their own terms: not only does it appear that there is no redescript
ion in his descriptions, but he proves incapable of offering any insig
hts into or exits from pressing problems in contemporary liberal socie
ties. This, I submit, can be traced back to his unwillingness to inves
tigate and redescribe power and power relations.