Jd. Wyrick et al., MOTION-PRESERVING PROCEDURES IN THE TREATMENT OF SCAPHOLUNATE ADVANCED COLLAPSE WRIST - PROXIMAL ROW CARPECTOMY VERSUS 4-CORNER ARTHRODESIS, The Journal of hand surgery, 20A(6), 1995, pp. 965-970
Seventeen patients were treated with scaphoid excision and four-corner
arthrodesis (lunate, capitate, hamate, triquetrum) for scapholunate a
dvanced collapse wrist and followed for a mean of 27 months. Eleven wr
ists in 10 patients had a proximal row carpectomy for scapholunate adv
anced collapse wrist and were followed for a mean of 37 months. The to
tal are of motion averaged 95 degrees in the four-corner arthrodesis p
atients and 115 degrees in the proximal row carpectomy patients, which
was 47% and 64%, respectively, of the range of motion of the opposite
wrist. Grip strength averaged 74% of the opposite wrist in the four-c
orner arthrodesis group and 94% in the proximal row carpectomy group.
Three wrists in the four-corner arthrodesis group failed and were succ
essfully converted to a total wrist fusion; two additional patients ar
e awaiting arthrodesis. There were no failures in the proximal row car
pectomy group. Proximal row carpectomy showed a high degree of patient
satisfaction and is our motion-preserving procedure of choice except
in those wrists with advanced capitolunate arthritis.