N. Mahanonda et al., RANDOMIZED DOUBLE-BLIND, PLACEBO-CONTROLLED TRIAL OF ORAL ATENOLOL INPATIENTS WITH UNEXPLAINED SYNCOPE AND POSITIVE UPRIGHT TILT-TABLE TEST-RESULTS, The American heart journal, 130(6), 1995, pp. 1250-1253
The objective of this investigation was the assessment of the response
rate of oral atenolol in patients with vasovagal syncope after 1 mont
h of treatment. We randomized into two groups all patients referred to
our unit who had had at least one episode of syncope or two episodes
of presyncope 1 month before presentation and had a positive isuprel T
ilt Table Test (TTT). Group 1 (Gr 1) received oral atenolol, and group
2 (Gr 2) received placebo medication. After a 1-month period patients
were reassessed for degree of their symptoms and underwent repeated T
TT. Forty-two patients were enrolled in the study. Gr 1 and Gr 2 were
comparable in age (38 +/- 13 years vs 43 +/- 14 years, p = 0.216 and s
ex (male/female = 6:15 vs 10:11, p = 0.204). The severity of attack wa
s similar in both groups. Eight patients in Gr 1 and six patients in G
r 2 had mitral valve prolapse (p = 0.5). No significant differences we
re seen in systolic blood pressure (122 +/- 17 vs 117 +/- 16 mm Hg, p
= 0.334), diastolic blood pressure (70 +/- 11 vs 72 +/- 11 mm Hg, p =
0.677), and heart rate (79 +/- 12 vs 79 +/- 13, p = 0.98) between the
two groups. The response rates (negative TTT) after 1 month of treatme
nt were 62% versus 5% (p = 0.0004) in the atenolol and control group,
respectively. Moreover, patients who received atenolol reported feelin
g better compared with those who received placebo (71% vs 29%, p = 0.0
2). In conclusion, atenolol significantly improved symptoms of patient
s with vasovagal syncope. Patients who received atenolol were more lik
ely to have negative isuprel TTT.