Jh. Dorsey et al., CLINICAL INDICATIONS FOR HYSTERECTOMY ROUTE - PATIENT CHARACTERISTICSOR PHYSICIAN PREFERENCE, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology, 173(5), 1995, pp. 1452-1460
OBJECTIVES: Our purpose was to compare the indications, characteristic
s, surgical management, and outcomes of patients undergoing total abdo
minal hysterectomy, total vaginal hysterectomy, and laparoscopically a
ssisted vaginal hysterectomy and to assess whether patients who underw
ent abdominal hysterectomy might have been candidates for laparoscopic
ally assisted vaginal hysterectomy and whether patients who underwent
total abdominal hysterectomy or laparoscopically assisted vaginal hyst
erectomy might have been candidates for total vaginal hysterectomy. ST
UDY DESIGN: The hospital charts of 502 women who underwent elective in
patient hysterectomy at a single large general hospital between Januar
y 1992 and November 1993 were abstracted retrospectively by use of a s
tructured data abstraction instrument. The study included patients ope
rated on by 16 different experienced gynecologists. Data were collecte
d regarding patient demographic characteristics, clinical history and
preoperative physical examination, indications for surgery, route of h
ysterectomy, intraoperative findings, pathologic study results, and ou
tcomes in the immediate postoperative hospitalization period. RESULTS:
Patient age, race, weight, parity, and previous surgical history were
significantly associated with hysterectomy type. Although no nullipar
ous patients and no patients with a uterine size estimated preoperativ
ely to be >12 weeks of gestation underwent total vaginal hysterectomy,
16.6% and 30.6% of laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy pat
ients had these characteristics, respectively. A total of 6.6% of tota
l abdominal hysterectomy cases and 15.7% of laparoscopically assisted
vaginal hysterectomy cases lacked an obvious justification for an abdo
minal procedure. On average, surgical time was 23 minutes longer for l
aparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy than for total abdominal
hysterectomy and 30 minutes longer for total abdominal hysterectomy t
han for total vaginal hysterectomy. When uterine size or configuration
impaired access to uterine vessels, laparoscopically assisted vaginal
hysterectomy was difficult to perform. Postoperative morbidity was si
milar across the three procedures, but average length of hospital stay
was 2.8 days, 3.5 days, and 4.4 days for laparoscopically assisted va
ginal hysterectomy total vaginal hysterectomy, and total abdominal hys
terectomy, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Although there are some consiste
nt and statistically significant differences in the characteristics of
patients undergoing total abdominal hysterectomy versus laparoscopica
lly assisted vaginal hysterectomy versus total vaginal hysterectomy la
paroscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy is enabling many patients
to avoid total abdominal hysterectomy. However, many patients undergo
ing total abdominal hysterectomy and laparoscopically assisted vaginal
hysterectomy could probably undergo total vaginal hysterectomy instea
d. Clinical outcomes were similar regardless of type of hysterectomy p
erformed. Practice style and personal preference of the surgeon thus m
ay be playing a significant role in selection of hysterectomy type. La
paroscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy becomes technically diffi
cult acid conversion to total abdominal hysterectomy is more frequent
when uterine size or configuration impairs access to uterine vessels.