Sl. Kjos et al., ANTEPARTUM SURVEILLANCE IN DIABETIC PREGNANCIES - PREDICTORS OF FETALDISTRESS IN LABOR, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology, 173(5), 1995, pp. 1532-1539
OBJECTIVE: Our purpose was to evaluate an antepartum testing program b
ased on twice-weekly nonstress testing and amniotic fluid evaluation i
n pregnancies complicated by diabetes mellitus and to weight the test
components in the prediction of fetal distress requiring cesarean deli
very. STUDY DESIGN: During the 4-year period of 1987 through 1990, 213
4 women with pregnancies complicated by diabetes underwent antepartum
testing. Of these 1501 women (class A(1), n = 505; A(2)-diet, n = 305;
A(2)-insulin, n = 580; B-1 n = 71; C to D, n = 29; R to F, n = Il)wer
e delivered within 4 days of their last test. Categoric analysis of da
ta was performed according to diabetic class, fetal heart rate results
, and the presence of decreased, normal, or increased amniotic fluid a
ssessment. A univariate logistical regression was first conducted with
cesarean delivery for fetal distress as outcome variable by use of th
e following variables: fetal weight and sex, diabetic class, gestation
al age at delivery, presence of additional indications for antepartum
testing, largest vertical pocket, amniotic fluid index (summation of t
he four quadrants of the largest vertical pocket), nonstress test reac
tivity (two accelerations of greater than or equal to 15 beats/min of
15 seconds' duration), presence of decelerations (greater than or equa
l to 15 beats/min for 15 seconds) during the nonstress test, and the i
nteractions of the nonstress test with deceleration, largest vertical
pocket, and amniotic fluid index. Multivariate analysis was then appli
ed to predict the best model. RESULTS: No stillbirths occurred within
4 days of the last antepartum test. However, the corrected stillbirth
rate of the entire tested population was 1.4 per 1000. Eighty-five wom
en required cesarean delivery for fetal distress. The factors most pre
dictive of cesarean delivery for fetal distress (p < 0.05, odds ratio
and 95% confidence interval) were a deceleration (3.60, 2.14 to 6.06),
nonreactive nonstress test (2.68, 1.60 to 4.49), and the interaction
of both a nonreactive nonstress test and decelerations (5.63, 2.67 to
11.9). Amniotic fluid assessment by largest vertical pocket or amnioti
c fluid index were not statistically significant. The multivariate ana
lysis selected the interaction of nonstress test and deceleration as t
he best significant predictor for cesarean delivery for fetal distress
. CONCLUSION: An antepartum fetal surveillance program using twice-wee
kly nonstress test and fluid index assessment in pregnancies complicat
ed by diabetes was successful in preventing stillbirth, The absence of
fetal heart rate reactivity and the presence of decelerations were pr
edictive of the diagnosis of fetal distress in labor requiring cesarea
n delivery, Ultrasonographic assessment of amniotic fluid volume was n
ot a significant predictor of fetal distress in labor in the diabetic
pregnancy.