Ma. Mccoll et J. Friedland, THE EFFECTS OF AGE AND DISABILITY ON SOCIAL SUPPORT, International journal of rehabilitation research, 18(4), 1995, pp. 325-340
Currently, one of the most promising areas of community intervention f
or researchers and practitioners alike is social support. Social suppo
rt has been shown to promote positive community outcomes in a variety
of populations and situations, leading to optimistic projections about
community interventions. However, the mixed success of intervention e
fforts suggests that our understanding of social support is still far
from adequate. In particular, our understanding is sketchy about the e
ffects of variables like age and disability on the capacity of individ
uals to develop and sustain social supports. This study examines the e
ffects of age and disability on social support, so that this understan
ding might guide intervention efforts. The sample consisted of 210 ind
ividuals, with ages ranging from 18 to 70 years, who were interviewed
in their homes. The study involved two distinct groups of disabled adu
lts, 90 of whom had had a stroke, and 120 of whom had had a spinal cor
d injury. Using multiple regression, we studied the independent and jo
int effects of age and disability on source, type and overall satisfac
tion with social support. The results indicated that both age and disa
bility have small but significant effects on specific aspects of socia
l support. Older age was found to be related to higher levels of profe
ssional social support, but not to any other dimensions of support. Di
sability, on the other hand, was related to social support in a number
of ways. As might be expected, functional independence was related to
more support from community individuals and less from professionals,
as well as to decreased satisfaction with social support. Further, tho
se with spinal cord injuries had more of all three types of support (i
nstrumental, informational and emotional) than those with strokes, as
well as having more support from individuals in their communities. The
findings suggest that those with strokes and those with less severe d
isabilities are at greater risk of poor support.