M. Maj et al., NONRESPONSE TO REINSTITUTED LITHIUM PROPHYLAXIS IN PREVIOUSLY RESPONSIVE BIPOLAR PATIENTS - PREVALENCE AND PREDICTORS, The American journal of psychiatry, 152(12), 1995, pp. 1810-1811
Objective: The authors explored the prevalence and predictors of nonre
sponse to reinstituted lithium prophylaxis in bipolar patients who had
relapsed after discontinuation of successful lithium treatment. Metho
d: The study was conducted with 54 bipolar patients for whom lithium h
ad been reintroduced after one or more recurrences following discontin
uation of successful prophylaxis. They were followed up, through bimon
thly personal interviews, for 1 year after recovery from the episode d
uring which lithium treatment had been resumed, or up to the first rec
urrence with onset after lithium reinstitution. Results: During the fo
llow-up period, 44 patients did not have any affective episodes, where
as 10 had at least one recurrence. The only significant difference bet
ween she two patient groups was the longer duration of prediscontinuat
ion lithium treatment for the patients who relapsed. Conclusions: Nonr
esponse to reinstituted prophylaxis should be considered among the pos
sible risks of the interruption of effective long-term lithium treatme
nt.