BOTULINUM TOXIN-F IN THE TREATMENT OF TORTICOLLIS CLINICALLY RESISTANT TO BOTULINUM TOXIN-A

Authors
Citation
Gl. Sheean et Aj. Lees, BOTULINUM TOXIN-F IN THE TREATMENT OF TORTICOLLIS CLINICALLY RESISTANT TO BOTULINUM TOXIN-A, Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery and Psychiatry, 59(6), 1995, pp. 601-607
Citations number
42
Categorie Soggetti
Psychiatry,Neurosciences,"Clinical Neurology
ISSN journal
00223050
Volume
59
Issue
6
Year of publication
1995
Pages
601 - 607
Database
ISI
SICI code
0022-3050(1995)59:6<601:BTITTO>2.0.ZU;2-A
Abstract
Two reports have shown a Japanese preparation of botulinum toxin type F (BTX-F) to be an effective alternative for patients with torticollis who develop clinical resistance to botulinum toxin type A (BTX-A). A group of patients with torticollis, comprising five secondary non-resp onders and one primary nonresponder, were treated with a preparation o f BTX-F produced in the UK (Speywood Pharmaceuticals). A low dose of B TX-F (220 mouse units (MU) in total) was given into clinically affecte d neck muscles, followed six weeks later by an injection of a total of 520 MU. Antibodies to BTX-A (mouse protection assay) were present in all secondary non-responders but not in the primary non-responder. No patients developed atrophy after injection of Dysport BTX-A (40 MU) in to the left extensor digitorum brevis muscle whereas pronounced atroph y occurred in all patients after injection of 40 MU of BTX-F into the right extensor digitorum brevis muscle. Three patients improved subjec tively after treatment with 220 MU BTX-F and five (all secondary nonre sponders) after the subsequent dose of 520 MU (two considerably), with reduced Tsui scores, but group scores were only significantly changed after the higher dose. The primary non-responder remained unchanged a fter both doses of BTX-F. One patient reported mild dysphagia with 520 MU BTX-F. Mean duration of improvement with 520 MU BTX-F was five (ra nge 4-6)weeks. Thus BTX-F provides benefit for BTX-A non-responders wi th few side effects but for a shorter period than BTX-A, possibly due to relative underdosing. As with BTX-A, biological sensitivity to BTX- F does not necessarily predict a clinical response.