Gr. Harris, PRESSURE PULSE DISTORTION BY HYDROPHONES DUE TO DIMINISHED LOW-FREQUENCY RESPONSE, IEEE transactions on ultrasonics, ferroelectrics, and frequency control, 42(6), 1995, pp. 989-992
In characterizing the bandwidth of measurement devices used in ultraso
und exposimetry, attention has been focused on the high frequency resp
onse, However, current diagnostic ultrasound measurement standards hav
e low frequency specifications for hydrophones and associated amplifie
rs, and the response below 1 MHz can be especially significant when me
asuring lithotripsy pulses, To model the effects of diminished low fre
quency response, simulated diagnostic and lithotripsy pulses were filt
ered with a single-pole high-pass filter for a range of -3 dB cutoff f
requencies (denoted f(a)). For lithotripsy pulses, it was found that t
he pulse quantities peak rarefactional pressure (p(r)) and pulse width
(t(w)) were most sensitive to f(a), and to keep errors in p(r) and t(
w) below 10%, f(a) should be in the 10-60 kHz range for the pulses exa
mined, For the diagnostic case, p(r) was the quantity most significant
ly affected, and for an f(a) value approximately one-half the center f
requency, p(r) was decreased by more than 30% for a pulse modeled to s
how the effects of finite amplitude distortion typical of diagnostic p
ulses measured in water, Given this latter result, current hydrophone
and amplifier low frequency specifications may need to be reconsidered
.