PRESSURE PULSE DISTORTION BY HYDROPHONES DUE TO DIMINISHED LOW-FREQUENCY RESPONSE

Authors
Citation
Gr. Harris, PRESSURE PULSE DISTORTION BY HYDROPHONES DUE TO DIMINISHED LOW-FREQUENCY RESPONSE, IEEE transactions on ultrasonics, ferroelectrics, and frequency control, 42(6), 1995, pp. 989-992
Citations number
12
Categorie Soggetti
Engineering, Eletrical & Electronic",Acoustics
ISSN journal
08853010
Volume
42
Issue
6
Year of publication
1995
Pages
989 - 992
Database
ISI
SICI code
0885-3010(1995)42:6<989:PPDBHD>2.0.ZU;2-N
Abstract
In characterizing the bandwidth of measurement devices used in ultraso und exposimetry, attention has been focused on the high frequency resp onse, However, current diagnostic ultrasound measurement standards hav e low frequency specifications for hydrophones and associated amplifie rs, and the response below 1 MHz can be especially significant when me asuring lithotripsy pulses, To model the effects of diminished low fre quency response, simulated diagnostic and lithotripsy pulses were filt ered with a single-pole high-pass filter for a range of -3 dB cutoff f requencies (denoted f(a)). For lithotripsy pulses, it was found that t he pulse quantities peak rarefactional pressure (p(r)) and pulse width (t(w)) were most sensitive to f(a), and to keep errors in p(r) and t( w) below 10%, f(a) should be in the 10-60 kHz range for the pulses exa mined, For the diagnostic case, p(r) was the quantity most significant ly affected, and for an f(a) value approximately one-half the center f requency, p(r) was decreased by more than 30% for a pulse modeled to s how the effects of finite amplitude distortion typical of diagnostic p ulses measured in water, Given this latter result, current hydrophone and amplifier low frequency specifications may need to be reconsidered .