Objectives. This study was conducted to compare the physical propertie
s of a gallium alloy restorative material and a widely used mercury-co
ntaining dental amalgam. Methods. Although the specimens were not prep
ared according to ISO specifications, specimens of both materials were
subjected to ISO standard (ISO 1559; 1986) tests. The results were an
alyzed by ANOVA, Mann-Whitney U test and Student's t-test. Results. Th
e gallium alloy showed setting expansion which was greater than that f
or the other amalgam and greater than the upper limit set by the ISO s
tandard. For other properties, gallium alloy performed as well as, and
in the case of creep, was superior to that of the amalgam. Significan
ce. The gallium alloy proved difficult to manipulate even when using t
he PTFE coated instruments recommended by the manufacturer. It is sugg
ested that while the material may prove to be a viable alternative to
conventional dental amalgam, a considerable improvement in its handlin
g characteristics would be required before it would gain widespread ac
ceptance for clinical use.