A. Amorosi, GLAUCONY AND SEQUENCE STRATIGRAPHY - A CONCEPTUAL-FRAMEWORK OF DISTRIBUTION IN SILICICLASTIC SEQUENCES, Journal of sedimentary research. Section B, Stratigraphy and global studies, 65(4), 1995, pp. 419-425
Detailed analysis of recent literature on glaucony and selected case s
tudies (Eocene, Isle of Wight; Miocene, northern Apennines) shows that
the presence of glaucony alone is not diagnostic of a specific system
s tract of a depositional sequence, A reliable sequence stratigraphic
interpretation of glaucony bearing units requires additional informati
on on glaucony, including: (1) spatial distribution, (2) maturity (dis
tinction between nascent, slightly evolved, evolved, and highly evolve
d glaucony), and (3) genetic attributes (differentiation of autochthon
ous from allochthonous, and intrasequential from extrasequential glauc
ony). Autochthonous glaucony is common at various stratigraphic levels
in the transgressive systems tract (TST) and the lower highstand syst
ems tract (HST), showing an upward increase (TST) and then decrease (H
ST) in abundance and maturity, The condensed section can be distinguis
hed from the overlying and underlying deposits by the higher concentra
tion and maturity of glaucony, Allochthonous intrasequential (parautoc
hthonous) glaucony can be present in the entire TST, HST, and lowstand
systems tract (LST), generally showing lower concentration and maturi
ty than its autochthonous counterpart, Al lochthonous extrasequential
(detrital) glaucony is present mainly in the LST, its concentration an
d composition depending on the characteristics of the source horizon,
The association between autochthonous and allochthonous (intrasequenti
al and extrasequential) glaucony commonly exists in the LST and in the
lower TST.