COMPARISON BETWEEN NAFARELIN ACETATE AND D-TRP6-LHRH FOR TEMPORARY PITUITARY SUPPRESSION IN IN-VITRO FERTILIZATION (IVF) PATIENTS - A PROSPECTIVE CROSSOVER STUDY
V. Tanos et al., COMPARISON BETWEEN NAFARELIN ACETATE AND D-TRP6-LHRH FOR TEMPORARY PITUITARY SUPPRESSION IN IN-VITRO FERTILIZATION (IVF) PATIENTS - A PROSPECTIVE CROSSOVER STUDY, Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics, 12(10), 1995, pp. 715-719
Purpose: Nafarelin acetate is a new gonadotropin releasing (GnRH) agon
ist analogue with unique potency, intranasal administration, and conve
nient storage. Hence, nafarelin was considered as an alternative for t
emporary pituitary suppression in patients under-going ovulation induc
tion in IVF. A crossover treatment in a prospective study was performe
d including 40 women with bilateral obstructed tubes and normal ovaria
n function, treated in 80 ovulation induction cycles using the long pr
otocol. Twenty patients used nafarelin acetate 600 mu g/daily in their
first cycle and received D-Trp6-LHRH, 0.5 mg/daily, in their followin
g cycle. The other 20 women used decapeptyl in their first cycle and r
eceived nafarelin in the second. Results: Estradiol suppression was ac
hieved by both D-Trp6-LHRH and nafarelin at equal time intervals. The
average total number of ampoules (P = 0.0005) and the length of admini
stration of hMG required for ovarian stimulation (P = 0.0002) and the
time interval between GnRHa initiation to oocyte retrieval (P = 0.04)
was significantly lower in nafarelin cycles. The number and the distri
bution between large and small follicles as well as the average number
of oocytes retrieved did not differ between the two GnRH analogues. C
onclusion: Our results demonstrate that nafarelin acetate is comparabl
e to D-Trp6-LHRH for temporary pituitary suppression used for controll
ed ovarian stimulation in IVF patients. However, using nafarelin ovari
an stimulation was achieved with fewer ampoules of hMG, administered f
or a shorter period of time, thus with a lesser cost.