ANXIETY, COMPENSATORY STRATEGIES AND READING-COMPREHENSION - PROCESSING DEFICIT VS LACK OF CONFIDENCE

The processing deficit and the lack of confidence hypotheses were test ed in order to explain why high-anxiety subjects are more likely than low-anxiety subjects to make regressive fixations and to reduce readin g speed. Subjects high or low in test anxiety read texts with (a) regr essive fixations and self-paced reading allowed, (b) self-paced readin g (no regressive fixations), and (c) fixed-pace reading (no regressive fixations or self-paced reading). Results indicated that (a) high-anx iety subjects made more regressive fixations and read more slowly than low-anxiety subjects; (b) comprehension performance was higher with r egressive fixations than with self-paced reading, and it was poorest i n the fixed-pace condition; and (c) there were no comprehension perfor mance differences as a function of anxiety in the regressive fixations and the self-paced conditions; in contrast, high-anxiety subjects sho wed greater impairment than low-anxiety subjects in the fixed-pace con dition. The more frequent use of regressive fixations in high-anxiety can be explained by the lack of confidence hypothesis, whereas the add itional reading time can be accounted for by the processing deficit hy pothesis.