Ihmb. Rinkes et al., PROLIFERATIVE RESPONSE OF HEPATOCYTES TRANSPLANTED INTO SPLEEN OR SOLID SUPPORT, The Journal of surgical research, 56(5), 1994, pp. 417-423
Understanding the regenerative behavior of transplanted hepatocytes is
of great importance for developing and improving such novel therapeut
ic strategies as hepatocellular transplantation and ex vivo gene thera
py. In this study the proliferative responsiveness of transplanted syn
geneic rat hepatocytes was examined in relation to the timing of the a
dministration of a mitogenic stimulus. For this purpose nuclear bromod
eoxyuridine incorporation after partial hepatectomy was investigated d
uring the early post-transplant phase. The response of intrasplenicall
y transplanted hepatocytes was compared to that of liver cells engraft
ed in polytetrafluoroethylene solid supports that had been implanted i
ntraperitoneally 4 weeks prior to transplantation. Nonstimulated, engr
afted hepatocytes exhibited a labeling index of similar to 0-1% indepe
ndent of the transplantation technique used. This ''spontaneous'' labe
ling index did not change with time. Partial hepatectomy, executed sim
ultaneously with hepatocyte transplantation through either technique,
did not result in significant alteration of this proliferation index.
Delayed kinetics were found not to be responsible for this lack of res
ponsiveness. When the mitogenic stimulus was given between 2 and g wee
ks post-transplantation, a significant increase in labeling index was
observed in comparison to sham-treated control animals. Maximal labeli
ng indices of similar to 3-4% were found if the stimulus took place at
4 weeks post-transplantation. Both the pattern and the extent of the
proliferative response seen in liver cells engrafted in solid supports
were similar to the ones found in intrasplenic hepatocytes, indicatin
g adequate vascularization of the supports. This data provides the fir
st description of proliferative response in hepatocytes transplanted b
y the solid support technique, which may offer an attractive alternati
ve to the intrasplenic route. It further suggests that, in analogy wit
h the in vitro situation, a lag time exists between hepatocyte isolati
on/transplantation and their maximal responsiveness to physiological s
timuli. It is concluded that timing of the administration of a prolife
rative stimulus is important for obtaining a maximal response of trans
planted hepatocytes during the early post-transplantation phase. (C) 1
994 Academic Press, Inc.