Sd. Cassard et al., REPRODUCIBILITY AND RESPONSIVENESS OF THE VF-14 - AN INDEX OF FUNCTIONAL IMPAIRMENT IN PATIENTS WITH CATARACTS, Archives of ophthalmology, 113(12), 1995, pp. 1508-1513
Objective: To assess the test-retest reliability and responsiveness of
the VF-14, which is an index of functional impairment in patient with
cataracts. Design: Observational longitudinal study. Patients were en
rolled prior to undergoing their first cataract surgery between July 1
5 and December 15, 1991, and they were followed up for 1 year after su
rgery. Setting: Patients were recruited from 72 ophthalmologists' prac
tices in three US cities. Patients: Five hundred fifty-two patients wh
o had undergone a surgical procedure in only one eye by the 4-month po
stoperative follow-up (responsiveness analyses) and a subset of these
(n = 426) who had not subsequently undergone surgery for the second ey
e by the 12-month postoperative follow-up (reproducibility analyses).
Main Outcome Measures: Two health status measures (the VF-14 and the S
ickness Impact Profile, two global measures of a patient's trouble and
satisfaction with his or her vision, and best corrected visual acuity
in each eye. Results: The VF-14 is highly reproducible, with an intra
class correlation coefficient of .79 when patient-rated criteria are u
sed to define stable patients. The intraclass correlation coefficient
was lower (.57 to .71) when various measures of visual acuity were use
d to define stable patients. The VF-14 is also about three times more
responsive to a change in vision than the Sickness Impact Profile, whi
ch is a generic health status measure (effect size of approximately 1.
00 vs 0.30). Estimates of the responsiveness of the VF-14 and the Sick
ness Impact Profile were not associated with preoperative visual acuit
y in the operated on or better eye. Responsiveness of the VF-14, howev
er, was higher in patients with greater self-rated trouble with vision
preoperatively. Conclusions: The VF-14 was reproducible in stable pat
ients during an 8-month period, and it was more responsive to clinical
ly significant changes in vision than was a generic health status meas
ure tie, the Sickness Impact Profile).