De. Stoltenberg et Rj. Wiederholt, GIANT FOXTAIL (SETARIA-FABERI) RESISTANCE TO ARYLOXYPHENOXYPROPIONATEAND CYCLOHEXANEDIONE HERBICIDES, Weed science, 43(4), 1995, pp. 527-535
A giant foxtail (PCW1) population putatively resistant to fluazifop-P
and sethoxydim was identified in a carrot, onion, and corn cropping sy
stem in Wisconsin during 1991. Previous, extensive use of fluazifop an
d fluazifop-P over several years imposed a high level of selection int
ensity on grass weeds. In a field experiment, fluazifop-P, sethoxydin,
and quizalofop at recommended dosages resulted in 58, 53, and 45% pla
nt survival, respectively, within the PCW1 giant foxtail population; n
o plants survived treatment with clethodim or nicosulfuron, and few pl
ants survived treatment with imazethapyr at recommended dosages. Based
on shoot dry biomass reduction in greenhouse experiments, a PCW1 gian
t foxtail biotype had 16-, > 9-, 4.9-, and 4.2-fold resistance to flua
zifop-P, diclofop, quizalofop, and fenoxaprop, respectively, relative
to a giant foxtail (AC1) accession that was susceptible to aryloxyphen
oxypropionate (APP) and cyclohexanedione (CHD) herbicides. The PCW1 bi
otype had 134-fold resistance to sethoxydim and slight and inconsisten
t resistance to clethodim. The PCW1 biotype and AC1 accession were equ
ally susceptible to imazethapyr, linuron, and oxyfluorfen. Based on pl
ant survival, a PCW1 giant foxtail accession had 25- acid > 143-fold r
esistance to fluazifop-P and sethoxydim, respectively, relative to the
AC1 accession. The selection intensity associated with repeated use o
f fluazifop and fluazifop-P over 5 yr contributed to the cross-resista
nce of PCW1 giant foxtail to APP and CHD herbicides.