In the medical community, the practice of admitting all electrical bur
ns for 24-48 h of observation, monitoring and laboratory evaluation is
widespread. This retrospective review of paediatric electrical burns
was conducted to determine which patients may safely be treated as out
patients. Retrospective analysis of all paediatric burns admitted betw
een 1980 and 1991 identified 35 patients with electrical injuries. Pat
ients were divided into two groups for analysis: those burned by expos
ure to household voltages (120-240 V; n = 26) and those exposed to hig
h voltages, in excess of 7000 V (n = 9). The majority of household ele
ctrical injuries occurred secondary to contact with the household 120
V (21/26). Contact with an extremity accounted for the largest number
of these injuries (7/26). The mouth was the second most frequent site
of injury (7/26). Most of these patients (20/26) had <1 per cent BSA b
urn. No patient in the household-voltage group had an arrythmia that r
equired treatment, nor were there any identified examples of compartme
nt syndrome or other vascular complications. Seven patients did requir
e minimal skin grafting. No deaths occurred in either group. The patie
nts in the household-voltage group were significantly younger. High-vo
ltage electrical injuries occurred in an older patient population and
required more aggressive care and surgical intervention. This was evid
ent at the lime of initial evaluation. Based an these darn, healthy ch
ildren with small partial-thickness electrical bums and no initial evi
dence of cardiac or neurovascular injury do not appear to need hospita
l admission.