B. Overdijk et Gj. Vansteijn, DISCRIMINATION BETWEEN CHITINASE AND CHITOBIASE ACTIVITIES IN CANDIDA-ALBICANS, Journal of General and Applied Microbiology, 41(4), 1995, pp. 281-295
Measurement of chitinase activity in crude homogenates of Candida albi
cans with the artificial substrates 4-methylumbelliferyl-beta-D-N,N',N
'' triacetylchitotrioside and 4-methylumbelliferyl-beta-D-N, N'-diace
tylchitobioside (MU-[GlcNAc](3,2)) showed that both chitobiase and chi
tinase were involved in the liberation of the fluorophore methylumbell
iferone (MU). The substrate MU-[GlcNAc](3) appeared to be digested by
means of two separate mechanisms, resulting in a lag-phase in the time
curve of the MU-release, and thus making this release non-linear with
time. The first mechanism is the action of an endochitinase that rele
ased MU in one step; this reaction could be inhibited by allosamidin.
The second probable mechanism involves the digestion of the substrate
by the stepwise release of the outer two GlcNAc residues by a chitobia
se, followed either by a third chitobiase-catalyzed release of the fin
al GlcNAc or by the action of a beta-N-acetylhexosaminidase, that is a
lso present in C. albicans, Hydrolysis of the substrate MU-[GlcNAc](2)
was not inhibited by allosamidin, suggesting that the two GlcNAc resi
dues in this substrate are probably released in two steps, either by t
he action of chitobiase alone, or by the successive action of chitobia
se (step 1) and beta-N-acetylhexosaminidase (step 2). Our results show
that the activities of the individual enzymes involved in chitin degr
adation cannot be determined on the basis of MU release in unfractiona
ted homogenates of C. albicans.