M. Averna et al., FAMILIAL HYPOBETALIPOPROTEINEMIA IS NOT ASSOCIATED WITH LOW-LEVELS OFLIPOPROTEIN(A), Arteriosclerosis, thrombosis, and vascular biology, 15(12), 1995, pp. 2165-2175
To assess whether very low concentrations of LDL affected lipoprotein(
a) [Lp(a)] concentrations and apo(a) associations with lipoproteins, w
e studied Lp(a) levels and associations in heterozygous subjects with
familial hypobeta-lipoproteinemia FHBL) associated with several trunca
ted forms of apoB-100, ranging from apoB-31 to apoB-89. Distributions
of apo(a) isotypes were assessed by a combined electrophoresis-immunob
lotting procedure that detects 34 isoforms. Lp(a) concentrations were
quantified by two ELISAs, one detecting total apo(a) and the other apo
B-bound apo(a) in plasma. Associations of apo(a) with plasma lipoprote
ins were evaluated by gel permeation chromatography (FPLC) and DGUC fo
llowed by analyses of elution and gradient fractions by apo(a) ELISA.
In addition, associations were examined by nondenaturing electrophores
is or immunoprecipitation of whole plasma and examination of contents
by immunoblotting. Finally, interactions between r-apo(a) and LDLs wer
e evaluated in reconstitution experiments. The distributions of apo(a)
isotypes did not differ between FHBL-affected and unaffected members
of the same kindreds, and concentrations of Lp(a) were similar even wh
en subjects were matched for isotypes both within and across kindreds.
In subjects heterozygous for apo(a) isoforms, the smaller isoforms we
re inversely related to Lp(a) concentrations, the larger isoforms were
not. The regression lines between Lp(a) concentrations and the smalle
r apo(a) isoforms were significant and negative in slope for both FHBL
-affected and unaffected subjects, but the slopes of the lines did not
differ. In multiple regression analyses, only the sizes of the smalle
r apo(a) isoforms contributed to the prediction of Lp(a) concentration
s. ApoB-size made no difference. In simple apoB-100/apoB-truncation he
terozygotes, virtually all apo(a) was complexed with apoB-100-containi
ng particles but not apoB-truncation particles, and r-apo(a) recombine
d with apoB-100-containing LDLs but not with apoB-89-containing LDLs.
Thus, (1) low apoB levels do not affect the plasma concentrations of L
p(a), (2) apo(a) binds apoB-100 to form Lp(a) particles of usual sizes
and densities, and (3) apoB truncations even as large as apoB-89 do n
ot form covalent bands with apo(a), although noncovalent associations
with apoB-89 may be present in plasma.