B. Bernspang et Ag. Fisher, DIFFERENCES BETWEEN PERSONS WITH RIGHT OR LEFT CEREBRAL VASCULAR ACCIDENT ON THE ASSESSMENT OF MOTOR AND PROCESS SKILLS, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation, 76(12), 1995, pp. 1144-1151
Objective: Persons with right and left cerebral vascular accident (RCV
A and LCVA) differ in terms of discrete impairments, but there is limi
ted information with regard to how such impairments translate into dif
ferences in disability, The following hypotheses were tested: (1) pers
ons with stroke have lower instrumental or domestic activities of dail
y living (IADL) ability than do matched nondisabled controls, (2) pers
ons with RCVA do not differ from persons with LCVA in LADL ability, an
d (3) persons with RCVA and LCVA differ in specific motor and process
skills that affect IADL performance. Design: Descriptive comparison. S
etting: Subjects were tested in settings where rehabilitation services
were received (home or clinic). Subjects: 71 persons with RCVA, 76 pe
rsons with LCVA, and 83 community-living nondisabled individuals drawn
from the Assessment of Motor and Process Skills (AMPS) database, matc
hed for age, gender, and number of tasks performed. Main Outcome Measu
re: AMPS, designed to measure type and severity of impairments manifes
ted in the context of IADL performance. The AMPS was administered to a
ll subjects in accordance with standardized testing procedures. Result
s: The two stroke groups did not differ significantly in IADL ability,
but both stroke groups had significantly lower IADL performance than
did the nondisabled subjects. On the AMPS motor scale, persons with RC
VA demonstrated greater impairment in pacing, transporting, and coordi
nating two body parts. Persons with LCVA demonstrated greater impairme
nts in calibrating movements, No differences were found between the tw
o groups in AMPS process skills. Conclusions: Persons with RCVA and LC
VA have hemisphere-specific differences in motor impairments, but do n
ot differ significantly in IADL ability. (C) 1995 by the American Cong
ress of Rehabilitation Medicine and the American Academy of Physical M
edicine and Rehabilitation