S. Crowley et al., COST-EFFECTIVENESS OF ALTERNATIVE INTERVENTIONS FOR THE PREVENTION AND TREATMENT OF CORONARY HEART-DISEASE, Australian journal of public health, 19(4), 1995, pp. 336-346
Although mortality from coronary heart disease (CHD) in Australia has
fallen dramatically since the 1960s, it still remains the major cause
of death in Australia and poses a significant burden on the economy. E
ven though a number of studies have concluded that prevention has been
the main determinant of the declines in CHD, a disproportionate amoun
t of health-care expenditure is devoted to treatment rather than preve
ntion. This paper reviews the international literature on the economic
appraisal (costs and benefits) of alternative interventions for the t
reatment and prevention of CHD with the view of assessing whether ther
e is sufficient evidence to justify a reallocation of resources away f
rom treatment to prevention. First, few studies on the economic evalua
tion of CHD prevention and treatment programs have been undertaken in
Australia, with most being from the United States and Europe. Second,
assumptions about the specification, measurement and valuation of cost
s, and the epidemiological evidence on program effectiveness have vari
ed. Third, health promotion and prevention programs are not necessaril
y more cost-effective than drug or surgical treatments for CHD. Indivi
dual interventions must be judged on their own merits. There is a need
for a systematic evaluation of interventions for CHD using primary Au
stralian data to better inform decision making on resource-allocation
priorities. Such an evaluation should incorporate economic evaluation
techniques.