Bn. Chikamai et al., AN EVALUATION OF METHODS FOR CHARACTERIZING AND MONITORING GUM-ARABICOF COMMERCE AND RELATED ACACIA GUMS, Wood Science and Technology, 30(1), 1995, pp. 49-61
Three methods that have been suggested as inexpensive for characterisa
tion of gum arabic were evaluated in characterising and monitoring gum
arabic of commerce, The methods were; physico-chemical and carbohydra
te analysis (analytical), determination of molecular mass by gel perme
ation chromatography (gpc) and an Enzyme Linked Immunosorbent Assay (E
LISA). The results revealed that gpc provides quick and consistent inf
ormation on gum arabic of commerce from Acacia senegal. It was able to
detect the three chemical species; Arabinogalactan protein complex (A
GP), Arabinogalactan (AG) and Glycoprotein (GP) fractions that are typ
ical of A. senegal and could differentiate gum from the two varieties
of A. senegal, i.e., var. senegal and var. kerensis on the basis of th
e enhanced UV peaks in the later. It was able to distinguish gums from
different Acacia species as well as suspected contaminants. The analy
tical method could differentiate between the two varieties of A. seneg
al on the basis of optical rotation, protein content and viscosity whi
ch were noted as basic parameters for comparison. However, where the p
roposed FAO (1990) specifiction was applied in its present form, it fa
iled to adequately characterise gum from var. kerensis as gum arabic.
Secondly, natural product variability i.e., the observed between sampl
e variation made the method to have limited application in adequately
characterising gum arabic from even a single source. The method was ab
le to distinguish gums from the other Acacia species purely on the bas
is of optical rotation though information on nitrogen and sugar compos
ition was also invaluable. Generating data on the composition of sugar
s requires time that militates against the method as a slow process. B
ecause of the overlap in the analytical parameters for some samples, i
t could be adequately characterise two of the samples that were presen
ted as suspected contaminants. Nonetheless, by combining information o
f gpc and analytical data, a better evaluation of the gums was achieve
d. The method of Elisa has a future scope but will require refining it
by utilising monoclonal antibodies to be developed for it to be more
specifc in characterising gum arabic from A. senegal.