COLCHICINE IN THE TREATMENT OF CUTANEOUS LEUKOCYTOCLASTIC VASCULITIS - RESULTS OF A PROSPECTIVE, RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL

Citation
G. Sais et al., COLCHICINE IN THE TREATMENT OF CUTANEOUS LEUKOCYTOCLASTIC VASCULITIS - RESULTS OF A PROSPECTIVE, RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL, Archives of dermatology, 131(12), 1995, pp. 1399-1402
Citations number
22
Categorie Soggetti
Dermatology & Venereal Diseases
Journal title
ISSN journal
0003987X
Volume
131
Issue
12
Year of publication
1995
Pages
1399 - 1402
Database
ISI
SICI code
0003-987X(1995)131:12<1399:CITTOC>2.0.ZU;2-L
Abstract
Background and Design: Cutaneous leukocytoclastic vasculitis is an inf lammatory vascular disease with a variable course. There is no defined therapy for this entity. Contradictory data on the effect of colchici ne have been reported. To determine the efficacy of colchicine in cuta neous leukocytoclastic vasculitis, 41 patients were randomly selected to receive oral colchicine, 0.5 mg twice daily, or topical emollients. Response to treatment was judged according to the reduction in the nu mber of lesions. After 1 month, in those patients in whom a complete o r no response was achieved, therapy was withdrawn; in those with a par tial response, treatment was maintained for the following 2 months. At the end of 3 months, treatment was continued only in those patients i n whom a relapse occurred. Results: Twenty patients in each group comp leted 1 month of treatment. One patient taking colchicine dropped out because of diarrhea. At the end of the first month of the study, five patients in the control group and four in the colchicine group achieve d a complete response. Nine patients who had a partial response (four in the colchicine group and five in the control group) continued to re ceive treatment for the following 2 months. Three patients in the colc hicine group suffered a relapse after discontinuing therapy but experi enced remission with reinstitution of therapy. At the end of the 3 mon th period, 12 patients in the colchicine group and 10 patients in the control group Showed no significant response. Complete response was ac hieved in five patients in the colchicine group and in seven in the co ntrol group. At the 1-year follow-up, 10 patients in each group had no clinical evidence of cutaneous vasculitis. Conclusions: Colchicine ha d no significant therapeutic effect in this controlled study. However, the finding that relapse occurred on cessation of colchicine therapy in three complete responders suggests that colchicine can be effective in some patients, despite our negative results.