T. Gill et al., REVISION TOTAL KNEE ARTHROPLASTY AFTER FAILED UNICOMPARTMENTAL KNEE ARTHROPLASTY OR HIGH TIBIAL OSTEOTOMY, Clinical orthopaedics and related research, (321), 1995, pp. 10-18
A retrospective matched-pair comparative analysis was done between 30
total knee arthroplasties following failed high tibial osteotomies and
30 total knee arthroplasties following failed unicompartmental knee a
rthroplasties. The groups were matched according to age, gender, type
of prosthesis, primary disease, and length of followup. A minimum foll
owup of 2 years was required for inclusion in the study, and the avera
ge followup was 3.8 years (range, 2-9 years). The Knee Society Knee Sc
ore for the high tibial osteotomy group was significantly higher than
that for the unicompartmental arthroplasty group. More osseous reconst
ructions were required in the unicompartmental revisions, Difficulty w
ith exposure was not significantly greater in the osteotomy group, Rat
es of component loosening were not significantly different between the
groups. A failed unicompartmental knee arthroplasty and a failed high
tibial osteotomy can be revised successfully to a total knee arthropl
asty. The results confirm that revisions after unicondylar arthroplast
y and high tibial osteotomy are technically demanding. In this series,
the results of total knee arthroplasty following unicompartmental kne
e arthroplasty approached but did not equal those obtained after high
tibial osteotomy.