PATIENT OUTCOME WITH REINFECTION FOLLOWING REIMPLANTATION FOR THE INFECTED TOTAL KNEE ARTHROPLASTY

Citation
Ad. Hanssen et al., PATIENT OUTCOME WITH REINFECTION FOLLOWING REIMPLANTATION FOR THE INFECTED TOTAL KNEE ARTHROPLASTY, Clinical orthopaedics and related research, (321), 1995, pp. 55-67
Citations number
40
Categorie Soggetti
Surgery,Orthopedics
ISSN journal
0009921X
Issue
321
Year of publication
1995
Pages
55 - 67
Database
ISI
SICI code
0009-921X(1995):321<55:POWRFR>2.0.ZU;2-#
Abstract
From 1976 to 1992, 24 knees (24 patients) were treated for reinfection after reimplantation of a prosthesis to treat an infected total knee arthroplasty. Including the index total knee arthroplasty, the average number of total procedures for the affected knee was 9.3 procedures ( range, 5-23 procedures), and surgical procedures used for the affected knee after reinfection averaged 3.7 procedures (range, 1-12 procedure s). The final outcome included 10 knees with a successful knee arthrod eses, 5 patients with infected prostheses who were prescribed suppress ive oral antibiotic treatment, 4 above the knee amputations, 3 persist ent pseudarthroses of the knee joint, 1 resection arthroplasty, and 1 uninfected total knee prosthesis. A poor prognosis was associated with use of a hinged knee design: 3 of the 4 amputations were done after a hinge knee prosthesis was implanted; 2 patients had a persistent pseu darthrosis after a failed attempt at knee arthrodesis; 1 patient had a resection arthroplasty; and 1 patient had a retained infected prosthe sis. A successful arthrodesis in which the initial attempt included us e of an external fixation device was more likely for prostheses withou t stems (75%) when compared with cemented stemmed prostheses (40%). Lo ng intramedullary arthrodesis was successful in all 3 attempts. Aspira tion for diagnosis followed by oral antibiotic suppression was univers ally unsuccessful in 4 patients, whereas early aggressive open debride ment facilitated retention of the prosthesis in 4 of 6 patients. The i ncreased difficulty in achieving a healed wound, a successful knee art hrodesis, and eradication of infection with subsequent nonprosthetic s alvage procedures as well as the attendant morbidity associated with r einfection must be considered carefully and discussed with the patient before the reimplantation prosthesis is inserted to treat the infecte d total knee arthroplasty.