CYCLOSPORINE USE IN THE PRECOLECTOMY CHRONIC ULCERATIVE-COLITIS PATIENT - A COMMUNITY EXPERIENCE AND ITS RELATIONSHIP TO PROSPECTIVE AND CONTROLLED CLINICAL-TRIALS

Citation
R. Kozarek et al., CYCLOSPORINE USE IN THE PRECOLECTOMY CHRONIC ULCERATIVE-COLITIS PATIENT - A COMMUNITY EXPERIENCE AND ITS RELATIONSHIP TO PROSPECTIVE AND CONTROLLED CLINICAL-TRIALS, The American journal of gastroenterology, 90(12), 1995, pp. 2093-2096
Citations number
24
Categorie Soggetti
Gastroenterology & Hepatology
ISSN journal
00029270
Volume
90
Issue
12
Year of publication
1995
Pages
2093 - 2096
Database
ISI
SICI code
0002-9270(1995)90:12<2093:CUITPC>2.0.ZU;2-O
Abstract
Objective: To define what effect seminal and controlled clinical trial s have on practice patterns within a gastroenterological community. To define whether these practice patterns reproduce reported treatment m ethods and whether results comparable with those reported in such tria ls are noted within a community practice setting. Methods: Mailed surv eies, with telephone follow-up, were sent to all members of the Pacifi c Northwest Gastroenterology Society. Respondents were queried regardi ng cyclosporin use in the precolectomy chronic ulcerative colitis (CUC ) patient. Data collected included patient demographics, disease durat ion and extent, pretreatment use of steroids, method, dosage, and dura tion of cyclosporin therapy, side effects, and short-term and subseque nt clinical results. Results: Twenty-one percent of 81 respondents had used cyclosporin for precolectomy CUC, approximately one-half using c onstant infusion and one-half using parenteral bolus therapy. Side eff ects attributed to the cyclosporin were noted in eight of 30 patients (27%), and acute colectomy was avoided in 17 patients (57%). Subsequen t colectomy was required in an additional nine patients (73% total) wi thin a 6-month follow-up period, a significantly higher colectomy rate than that reported in prospective trials. Conclusions: Potential reas ons precluding cyclosporin use within the gastroenterological communit y may include lack of knowledge about cyclosporin therapy for CUC, lac k of opportunity, skepticism, fear of medication side effects, survey sampling error, or treatment philosophy. Potential reasons for failure to duplicate the results reported in controlled trials are more compl ex but may include inadequate treatment duration, the learning curve a ssociated with use of a new medication, or acceptance of colectomy as the treatment of choice in patients with acutely or chronically debili tating disease.