It is now over twenty years since the well-established sociology of de
viance along with the emergent sociology of mass media produced the co
ncept of 'moral panic'. The various studies of youth culture, drugtake
rs and the media reaction to these and other phenomena produced some o
f the most important work in post-war British sociology. This article
argues that it is now time that every stage in the process of construc
ting a moral panic, as well as the social relations which support it,
should be revised. It suggests that more attention should be paid to t
he consequences of the great expansion of the media and to the many mo
re participants involved in public debate (including, for example, com
mercial promotions departments and pressure groups). We argue that 'fo
lk devils' are less marginalized than they once were; they not only fi
nd themselves vociferously and articulately supported in the same mass
media that castigates them, but their interests are also defended by
their own niche and micro-media. Finally, the article suggests that wh
at were more stable points of social control have undergone some degre
e of shift, if not transformation.