E. Ovrum et al., COMPLEMENT AND GRANULOCYTE ACTIVATION IN 2 DIFFERENT TYPES OF HEPARINIZED EXTRACORPOREAL CIRCUITS, Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery, 110(6), 1995, pp. 1623-1632
Complement and granulocyte activation were studied in cardiopulmonary
bypass circuits completely coated with either end-attached covalent-bo
nded heparin, the Carmeda BioActive Surface, or with the Duraflo II bo
nded heparin, in combination with reduced systemic heparinization (act
ivated clotting time > 250 seconds), The control groups were perfused
with uncoated circuits and full heparin dose (activated clotting time
> 480 seconds), Altogether 67 patients undergoing elective first-time
myocardial revascularization were investigated, having extracorporeal
perfusion dth a Duraflo II coated circuit (n = 17), an identical but u
ncoated circuit (n = 17), a Carmeda coated circuit (n = 17), or an equ
ivalent uncoated circuit (n = 16), During cardiopulmonary bypass, the
C3 activation products C3b, iC3b, and C3c (CSbc) and the terminal SC5b
-9 complement complex increased markedly in all four groups compared w
ith baseline, but significantly less in the two coated groups than in
their control groups, Additionally, a significantly lower concentratio
n of C3bc was observed in the Carmeda coated group, with maximal incre
ase of median 28 AU/ml compared with 50 AU/ml in the Duraflo II coated
group (p = 0.003), Similarly, in the Carmeda coated group, the maxima
l increase of terminal complement complex was considerably lower (0.8
AU/ml) than the levels recognized in the Duraflo n, coated group (2.4
AU/ml) (p < 0.001), The release of the granulocyte activation enzymes
myeloperoxidase and lactoferrin increased from the beginning of the op
eration, with peak levels at the end of bypass, A significant reductio
n of lactoferrin release was recognized when comparing the coated grou
ps with the control groups, The difference between the two coated grou
ps (Carmeda 229 mu g/L; Duraflo II 332 mu g/L; p = 0.05) was marginall
y significant, For myeloperoxidase, no significant differences were ob
served between the coated and uncoated groups, In conclusion, both typ
es of heparin-coated circuits reduced complement activation and releas
e of lactoferrin, but the Carmeda circuit proved to be more effective
than the Duraflo II equipment.