The ideal restorative material should cause minimal wear of opposing e
namel. This study compared the effects of gold alloy, glazed porcelain
, and a laboratory-processed composite on opposing enamel. Ten samples
of a type III gold alloy, a porcelain, and a visible-light, heat, and
vacuum-processed composite were abraded against cusps of extracted mo
lars for 10,000 cycles on an abrading machine. Pretest and posttest pr
ofilometric measurements of the restorative materials demonstrated no
statistical difference, Pretest and posttest tracings of the cusps wer
e made on an optical comparator to determine loss of vertical height a
nd surface area. The porcelain caused significantly more loss of verti
cal height and surface area than the gold alloy or the composite, whic
h were similar.