EXAMINATION OF EGG NUMBER AND EGG WEIGHT VARIABLES AND THEIR EFFECTS ON DAILY MANAGEMENT IN AVIARY SYSTEMS FOR LAYING HENS

Authors
Citation
C. Lokhorst et A. Keen, EXAMINATION OF EGG NUMBER AND EGG WEIGHT VARIABLES AND THEIR EFFECTS ON DAILY MANAGEMENT IN AVIARY SYSTEMS FOR LAYING HENS, British Poultry Science, 36(5), 1995, pp. 693-705
Citations number
17
Categorie Soggetti
Agriculture Dairy & AnumalScience
Journal title
ISSN journal
00071668
Volume
36
Issue
5
Year of publication
1995
Pages
693 - 705
Database
ISI
SICI code
0007-1668(1995)36:5<693:EOENAE>2.0.ZU;2-D
Abstract
1. Characteristics of egg numbers and mean egg weight were examined fo r their usefulness in the daily management of aviary systems for layin g hens. 2. A number of 3238 brown Isabrown/Warren hens were housed in 1 compartment, a separated part of the house where the hens could move around freely, of a tiered-wired-floor aviary system (TWF-system). An automatic egg weighing and counting system (EWACS) was used to count and weigh eggs daily from 2 tiers of laying nests on 1 side of the com partment and the number of eggs for the whole compartment were counted daily by the farmer. Each tier was divided into 16 blocks of 5 indivi dual laying nests. Two adjoining blocks were called a group. To preven t hens from walking along all the laying nests in a tier, partitions w ere placed on the perches in front of the laying nests, between nest g roups 2-3, 4-5, and 6-7. 3. After the first 3 weeks of the laying peri od, the distribution of egg numbers over the nest groups within a tier became stable. If egg numbers were counted daily from only 1 nest gro up the coefficient of variation was 23.1%. If the eggs from the whole compartment were counted daily, the coefficient of variation for the n umber of eggs was 2.8%. The nest group, presence of a partition and ti er level influenced the daily number of eggs. 4. The distribution of t he mean egg weight over the different nest groups within a tier was st able for the whole laying period. The coefficient of variation of the daily mean egg weight for a nest group was 3.1%. The difference in mea n egg weight between nest groups was small, between 0.1 and 0.6 g, and the level of tiers and the presence of partitions between nest groups had no effect on the mean egg weight. 5. It could be concluded that e gg numbers could not be estimated reliably by taking samples from a gr oup of laying nests or a tier, but that it was necessary to count all the eggs from a compartment. The daily mean egg weight, however, could be estimated reliably on the basis of a sample of eggs from a nest gr oup or a tier. By using EWACS frequent samples could be taken, which d iminished the coefficient of variation so that the reliability of the data increased.