ELECTRONIC IDENTIFICATION WITH INJECTABLE TRANSPONDERS IN PIG PRODUCTION - RESULTS OF A FIELD TRAIL ON COMMERCIAL FARMS AND SLAUGHTERHOUSESCONCERNING INJECTABILITY AND RETRIEVABILITY
E. Lambooij et al., ELECTRONIC IDENTIFICATION WITH INJECTABLE TRANSPONDERS IN PIG PRODUCTION - RESULTS OF A FIELD TRAIL ON COMMERCIAL FARMS AND SLAUGHTERHOUSESCONCERNING INJECTABILITY AND RETRIEVABILITY, Veterinary quarterly, 17(4), 1995, pp. 118-123
A nationwide electronic system for the identification of all pigs is a
means to achieve a tighter control of livestock and meat in the Nethe
rlands, In order to examine the use of electronic identification trans
ponders, two field trails were performed, Transponders supplied by thr
ee separate companies were tested on pigs on commercial farms, In phas
e 1, each device was examined on separate farms and in phase 2, the th
ree devices were tested on each farm, A total of 3,436 and 5,947 trans
ponders from the different suppliers were injected in the base of the
ear at weaning in phase 1 and 2 on seven and five farms, respectively,
The following aspects were examined: technical labour for injection a
nd reading, readability of the transponders, impact on tissues at the
injection site, and retrieval of the transponder after slaughter, Afte
r instruction the farmer was well able to inj ect a transponder in a r
estrained piglet. The results show that in phases 1 and 2 1.6% to 7.3%
of the transponders were unreadable at retrieval in the slaughter lin
e, which is significantly (p<0.05) higher than the required maximum lo
ss of 1%, The 1.6% failure rate in phase 1 involved transponders from
a single supplier, Loss of identification was associated with rejectio
n after injection, expulsion during inflammation and technical failure
, Three weeks after injection on average 0.6% of the piglets had an ob
servable inflammation and at the time of retrieval pus was found aroun
d, on average, 1.2% of the transponders. An average of between 37% and
88% of the transponders were retrieved in the slaughter line from the
base of the ear in phases 1 and 2, The other transponders were retrie
ved medial or caudal to this position, This positional variation meant
that it was not consistently possible to remove the transponder from
the carcass within the required 4 second time period, It was concluded
that the systems should be improved before recommending their introdu
ction on a large scale, because the variation in readability and locat
ion is too high.