The precise guidelines recommended by the American Heart Association f
or blood pressure measurement are commonly overlooked by health-care w
orkers, who generally take blood pressure in an arbitrary way. To vali
date this observation we designed a descriptive and observational stud
y to be carried out in a major hospital. One hundred and seventy-two h
ealth-care workers divided into four groups (63 general practitioners,
25 clinical and 25 surgical specialists, and 59 nurses) were evaluate
d in a two-part test. In the first part (practical), the examinee had
to follow all the steps recommended by the American Heart Association
to get a passing score. In the second part (theoretical, which came se
cond to avoid influencing the practical), the examinee had to answer c
orrectly 7 of 10 questions based on the American Heart Association's g
uidelines to obtain a passing score. The highest accepted variation in
systolic and diastolic pressures between examinee and observer was +/
-4 mm Hg. None of the examinees followed the American Heart Associatio
n's recommendations. Sixty-three percent of systolic and 53% of diasto
lic readings were out of range. Surgical specialists obtained the best
practical results (45% systolic and 64% diastolic within range), and
nurses obtained the lowest values (29% and 39%, respectively; P=.03 ve
rsus surgical specialists). These two groups showed deficiencies in th
e theoretical test (nurses, 10% correct answers and surgical specialis
ts, 16%). Clinical specialists obtained the best results on the theore
tical test (60% correct; P<.05 versus the other groups) but were defic
ient in the practical test (32% systolic and 60% diastolic within rang
e). In conclusion, on practical and theoretical bases health-care work
ers took blood pressure inaccurately and incorrectly.