N. Abuaf et al., PREVALENCE OF ANTI-BETA(2)-GLYCOPROTEIN-I AND ANTI-PROTHROMBIN ANTIBODIES IN 2174 PATIENTS AND 107 HEALTHY CONTROLS, Nouvelle revue francaise d'hematologie, 37, 1995, pp. 53-56
Prevalences of anticardiolipin (aCLA), anti-beta(2)-glycoprotein I (an
ti-beta(2)-GPI) and anti-prothrombin IgG antibodies were determined by
ELISA in 2174 patients and 107 blood donors. Among patients, 137 had
systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), while 683 displayed at least one c
linical or biological feature suggestive of antiphospholipid syndrome:
497 patients had thrombosis, 51 patients had experienced at least 3 m
iscarriages or a foetal death at more than 12 weeks of gestation, 67 h
ad thrombocytopenia, 50 had lupus anticoagulants (LA), 13 had thrombos
is and LA, 3 had thrombocytopenia and LA and 2 had a history of foetal
lass and LA. Connective tissue or related disorders were present in 5
95 patients, 759 others were suffering from miscellaneous diseases and
cases of HIV infection were excluded from the study. Prevalences of a
CLA and anti-beta(2)-GPI antibodies were increased in patients with SL
E and/or LA in comparaison to all other groups (p < 0.001). In these p
atients, anti-beta(2)-GPI antibodies were often associated with aCLA,
34 (77%) of 44 patients with anti-beta(2)-GPI antibodies also having a
CLA (p < 0.001). In other patients the reverse was true, anti-p,GPI an
tibodies being infrequent and when present rarely associated with aCLA
(p < 0.001). The prevalence of sera with anti-beta(2)-GPI antibodies
but no aCLA was similar in all patient groups and in blood donors. The
se results suggest that at least two types of antiphospholipid contain
ing sera exist, those containing only one kind of antibody (aCLA or an
ti-beta(2)-GPI antibodies, type 1) which are poorly specific and those
associating aCLA and anti-beta(2)-GPI antibodies (type 2), highly spe
cific for SLE and/or LA. The prevalence of anti-prothrombin antibodies
was increased in patients with SLE and/or LA (p < 0.01) and in those
with an unexplained prolongation of APTT (p < 0.01). In the latter cas
e, since these antibodies were not associated with LA, aCLA or anti-be
ta(2)-GPI antibodies, this indicates that anti-prothrombin antibodies
may interfere in the APTT test and should therefore be screened in pat
ients presenting an unexplained prolongation of APTT.