Pf. Dahm et al., DETERMINING THE VALUE OF ADDITIONAL SURROGATE EXPOSURE DATA FOR IMPROVING THE ESTIMATE OF AN ODDS RATIO, Statistics in medicine, 14(23), 1995, pp. 2581-2598
Citations number
16
Categorie Soggetti
Statistic & Probability","Medicine, Research & Experimental","Public, Environmental & Occupation Heath","Statistic & Probability
We consider the design of both cohort and case-control studies in whic
h an initial ('stage 1') sample of complete data on an error-free dise
ase indicator (D), a correct ('gold-standard') dichotomous exposure me
asurement (X) and an error-prone exposure measurement (Z) are availabl
e, We calculate the amount of additional information on the odds ratio
relating D to X that one can obtain from a second ('stage 2') sample
of measurements only on D and Z, If one allows for differential measur
ement error in Z, there is often little advantage in having more than
four times as much data in stage 2 data as in stage 1. With the assump
tion that a non-differential measurement error model is reasonable, la
rger amounts of stage 2 data can be useful, Simulations indicate that
stage 1 samples of modest size (50 cases in case-control studies and 5
0 failures in cohort studies) yield sufficiently reliable estimates of
needed parameters to assist in determining an appropriate size for th
e stage 2 sample, These ideas apply in settings either where the amoun
t of stage 1 data is limited and fixed by external constraints or wher
e one has gathered stage 1 data in advance to avoid collecting superfl
uous stage 2 data.