In recent years, information systems (IS) outsourcing is increasing in
business organizations as a way to govern their IS operations. Burgeo
ning IS costs, lack of IS organization's responsiveness to users, and
a renewed emphasis on return on IS investment are among some of the re
asons towards this trend. Media reports are almost unanimous, and at t
imes euphoric, in their claims of benefits. However, a reporting bias
must be recognized: first, these reports are, at best, anecdotal accou
nts and second, they are based on the accounts of outsourcing vendors,
consultants, senior executives and those who remained or were promote
d in the organization after the outsourcing act Naturally, these indiv
iduals have a vested interest in making their decisions look beneficia
l. This article discusses the various advantages and pitfalls of IS ou
tsourcing, based on a dialectic view. It provides a balanced perspecti
ve, as it is based on a real case discussed by two individuals who wer
e on opposing sides of the fence: one was an outsourcing survivor and
was promoted, and the other was terminated due to decisions related to
outsourcing.