ALCOHOL-DEHYDROGENASE (ADH) ISOZYMES IN THE ADH(N) ADH(N) STRAIN OF PEROMYSCUS-MANICULATUS (ADH(-) DEERMOUSE) AND A POSSIBLE ROLE OF CLASS-III ADH IN ALCOHOL METABOLISM/
T. Haseba et al., ALCOHOL-DEHYDROGENASE (ADH) ISOZYMES IN THE ADH(N) ADH(N) STRAIN OF PEROMYSCUS-MANICULATUS (ADH(-) DEERMOUSE) AND A POSSIBLE ROLE OF CLASS-III ADH IN ALCOHOL METABOLISM/, Biochemical genetics, 33(9-10), 1995, pp. 349-363
Although the Adh(N)/Adh(N) strain of Peromyscus maniculatus (so-called
ADH(-) deermouse) has been previously considered to be deficient in A
DH, we found ADH isozymes of Classes II and III but not Class I in the
liver of this strain. On the other hand the Adh(F)/Adh(F) strain (so-
called ADH(+) deermouse), which has liver ADH activity, had Class I an
d III but not Class II ADH in the liver. In the stomach, Class III and
IV ADHs were detected in both deermouse strains, as well as in the dd
Y mouse, which has the normal mammalian ADH system with four classes o
f ADH. These ADH isozymes were identified as electrophoretic phenotype
s on the basis of their substrate specificity, pyrazole sensitivity, a
nd immunoreactivity. Liver ADH activity of the ADH(-) strain was barel
y detectable in a conventional ADH assay using 15 mM ethanol as substr
ate; however; it increased markedly with high concentrations of ethano
l (up to 3 M) or hexenol (7 mM). Furthermore, in a hydrophobic reactio
n medium containing 1.0 M t-butanol, liver ADH activity of this strain
at low concentrations of ethanol (<100 mM) greatly increased (about s
evenfold), to more than 50% that of ADH(+) deermouse. These results we
re attributable to the presence of Class III ADH and the absence of Cl
ass I ADH in the liver of ADH(-) deermouse. It was also found that eve
n the ADH(+) strain has low liver ADH activity (< 40% that of the ddY
mouse) with 25 mM ethanol as substrate, probably due to law activity i
n Class I ADH. Consequently, liver ADH activity of this strain was low
er than its stomach ADH activity, in contrast with the ddY mouse, whos
e ADH activity was much higher in the liver than in the stomach, as we
ll as other mammals. Thus, the ADH systems in both ADH(-) and ADH(+) d
eermouse were different not only from each other but also from that in
the ddY mouse; the ADH(-) strain was deficient in only Class I ADH, a
nd the ADH(+) strain was deficient in Class II ADH and down-regulated
in Class I ADH activity. Therefore, Class III ADH, which was found in
both strains and activated allosterically, may participate in alcohol
metabolism in deermouse, especially ill the ADH(-) strain.