COMPARISON OF THE IMMEDIATE, RESIDUAL, AND CUMULATIVE ANTIBACTERIAL EFFECTS OF NOVADERM-R, NOVASCRUB-R, BETADINE SURGICAL SCRUB, HIBICLENS,AND LIQUID SOAP
J. Faoagali et al., COMPARISON OF THE IMMEDIATE, RESIDUAL, AND CUMULATIVE ANTIBACTERIAL EFFECTS OF NOVADERM-R, NOVASCRUB-R, BETADINE SURGICAL SCRUB, HIBICLENS,AND LIQUID SOAP, American journal of infection control, 23(6), 1995, pp. 337-343
Background: Triclosan (Irgasan), an antibacterial active against staph
ylococci and coliform bacteria, has been formulated for use as a handw
ash. There has been only one previous report of the use of the glove j
uice test to determine the immediate, residual, and cumulative effects
of a 1% triclosan-based handwash product. There have been no previous
studies on the use of 1% triclosan combined with povidone-iodine (PI)
in a handwash product. Methods: The glove juice technique was used to
document and compare the immediate, 3-hour residual, and 5-day cumula
tive effects on the mean log(10) bacterial counts of 1% triclosan-base
d handwash product and 1% triclosan with 5% PI. A standardized surgica
l handwashing technique was used before sample collection. These resul
ts and the identity and type of the aerobic bacteria cultured from the
samples were compared with the results of standardized washing and gl
ove juice sampling with 4% weight/volume chlorhexidine gluconate (CHG)
, 7.5% PI, and a nonantimicrobial liquid soap. Results: All five teste
d products showed significant log(10) reduction from baseline on day 1
, hour 0 (p < 0.05). There was no significant difference between the m
ean log,, bacterial count when 7.5% PI, 4% CHG, and 1% triclosan with
5% PI were compared with each other immediately after washing (p > 0.0
5). There was a significant difference between 1% triclosan and the li
quid soap when they were each compared with 4% CHG, 7.5% PI, and 1% tr
iclosan with 5% PI. There was no statistically significant difference
between the 1% triclosan product and the liquid soap (p > 0.20). All p
roducts were effective at reducing the immediate bacterial count from
the baseline level. All formulations except the liquid soap showed sig
nificant cumulative effect (p < 0.05) after multiple washes, with no s
ignificant difference between the cumulative effects of the liquid soa
p and 1% triclosan (p > 0.05). Both products differed significantly (p
< 0.05) from the CHG, PI, and triclosan with PI. CHG, PI, and triclos
an with PI showed effects significantly different from each other (p <
0.05).