Two studies were performed to examine the effect of the complexity of
a physical task on the estimation of the time required for its perform
ance. Different paradigms for the estimation of time (prospective vs r
etrospective) were used with different methods of estimation (reproduc
tion vs verbal estimation). In Study 1, 32 pairs of adults were asked
to throw a ball to each other in different ways. The two groups were d
istinguished by the motor and cognitive changes required in moving fro
m one task to the next. One group had to perform 10 successive repetit
ions on each of five kinds of ball throws, while the other had to perf
orm the same number of ball throws but with each type being split into
two different successive sets of throws so here the task consisted of
changes. In Study 2, 60 children (aged 7 or 8 yr.) were asked to per
form a set of basketball tasks. The two groups were distinguished by t
he pace at which they had to perform the task, slowly or rapidly. The
results of the two studies indicated a negative relation between the c
omplexity of the task and the group's estimation of time. The reproduc
tive method yielded shorter estimations than the verbal method. The re
sults indicate that for physical activity the attentional model may we
ll be valid.