E. Donegan et al., DETECTION OF HEPATITIS-C AFTER LIVER-TRANSPLANTATION - 4 SEROLOGIC TESTS COMPARED, American journal of clinical pathology, 104(6), 1995, pp. 673-679
To determine the best method for detecting HCV infection in immunosupp
ressed patients, stored frozen serum from 101 liver transplant recipie
nts was tested for hepatitis C virus. Each sample was tested by four a
ssays. HCV RNA was detected by both polymerase chain reaction (PCR) an
d branched DNA signal amplification. Antibody to HCV was determined us
ing second-generation enzyme-linked immunoassay (EIA) and recombinant
immunoblot assay. Forty one transplant recipients met the working defi
nition for true positives of HCV infection. Of these ''true positives,
'' 98% were positive by HCV RNA PCR assay, 88% by b-DNA signal amplifi
cation assay, 88% by anti-HCV EIA, and 63% demonstrated two or more re
active bands on recombinant immunoblot. Five of 57 (9%) HCV-antibody n
egative recipients had HCV RNA detected by both methods. Of 44 HCV enz
yme-linked immunoassay (EIA) repeatedly reactive samples, the recombin
ant immunoblot was negative in 2 and indeterminate in 13. HCV RNA was
present in 9 of 13 recombinant immunoblot indeterminate sera. Nine EIA
repeatedly reactive sera were negative by both tests for HCV RNA. In
liver transplant recipients, HCV infection is best determined by measu
rement of HCV RNA. Antibody formation may be delayed or suppressed in
a minority of patients despite >10(9) equivalents/L (>10(6)/mL) of HCV
RNA in serum. Recombinant immunoblots with a single reactive band pat
tern often indicate HCV infection in immunosuppressed patients.