La. Marquez et Hb. Dunford, KINETICS OF OXIDATION OF TYROSINE AND DITYROSINE BY MYELOPEROXIDASE COMPOUND-I AND COMPOUNDS-II - IMPLICATIONS FOR LIPOPROTEIN PEROXIDATIONSTUDIES, The Journal of biological chemistry, 270(51), 1995, pp. 30434-30440
The oxidation of lipoproteins is considered to play a key role in athe
rogenesis, and tyrosyl radicals have been implicated in the oxidation
reaction. Tyrosyl radicals are generated in a system containing myelop
eroxidase, H2O2, and tyrosine, but details of this enzyme-catalyzed re
action have not been explored, We have performed transient spectral an
d kinetic measurements to study the oxidation of tyrosine by the myelo
peroxidase intermediates, compounds I and II, using both sequential mi
xing and single-mixing stopped-flow techniques. The one electron reduc
tion of compound I to compound II by tyrosine has a second order rate
constant of (7.7 +/- 0.1) x 10(5) M(-1) s(-1). Compound II is then red
uced by tyrosine to native enzyme with a second order rate constant of
(1.57 +/- 0.06) x 10(4) M(-1) s(-1). Our study further revealed that,
compared with horseradish peroxidase, thyroid peroxidase, and lactope
roxidase, myeloperoxidase is the most efficient catalyst of tyrosine o
xidation at physiological pH. The second order rate constant for the m
yeloperoxidase compound I reaction with tyrosine is comparable with th
at of its compound I reaction with chloride: (4.7 +/- 0.1) x 10(6) M(-
1) s(-1). Thus, although chloride is considered the major myeloperoxid
ase substrate, tyrosine is able to compete effectively for compound I.
Steady state inhibition studies demonstrate that chloride binds very
weakly to the tyrosine binding site of the enzyme. Coupling of tyrosyl
radicals yields dityrosine, a highly fluorescent stable compound that
had been identified as a possible marker for lipoprotein oxidation. W
e present spectral and kinetic data showing that dityrosine is further
oxidized by both myeloperoxidase compounds I and II. The second order
rate constants we determined for dityrosine oxidation are (1.12 +/- 0
.01) x 10(5) M(-1) s(-1) for compound I and (7.5 +/- 0.3) x 10(2) M(-1
) s(-1) for compound II. Therefore, caution must be exercised when usi
ng dityrosine as a quantitative index of lipoprotein oxidation, partic
ularly in the presence of myeloperoxidase and H2O2.