Jm. Michalski et al., 3-DIMENSIONAL CONFORMAL RADIATION-THERAPY IN PEDIATRIC PARAMENINGEAL RHABDOMYOSARCOMAS, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics, 33(5), 1995, pp. 985-991
Citations number
18
Categorie Soggetti
Oncology,"Radiology,Nuclear Medicine & Medical Imaging
Purpose: We evaluated the utility of three dimensional (3D) treatment
planning in the management of children with parameningeal head and nec
k rhabdomyosarcomas. Methods and Materials: Five children with paramen
ingeal rhabdomyosarcoma were referred for treatment at our radiation o
ncology center from May 1990 through January 1993. Each patient was ev
aluated, staged, and treated according to the Intergroup Rhabdomyosarc
oma Study, Patients were immobilized and underwent a computed tomograp
hy scan with contrast in the treatment position, Tumor and normal tiss
ues were identified with assistance from a diagnostic radiologist and
defined in each slice. The patients were then planned and treated with
the assistance of a 3D treatment planning system. A second plan was t
hen devised by another physician without the benefit of the 3D volumet
ric display. The target volumes designed with the 3D system and the tw
o-dimensional (2D) method were then compared, The dosimetric coverage
to tumor, tumor plus margin, and normal tissues was also compared with
the two methods of treatment planning. Results: The apparent size of
the gross tumor volume was underestimated with the conventional 2D pla
nning method relative to the 3D method, When margin was added around t
he gross tumor to account for microscopic extension of disease in the
2D method, the expected area of coverage improved relative to the 3D m
ethod, In each circumstance, the minimum dose that covered the gross t
umor was substantially less with the 2D method than with the 3D method
, The inadequate dosimetric coverage was especially pronounced when th
e necessary margin to account for subclinical disease was added, In ea
ch case, the 2D plans would have delivered substantial dose to adjacen
t normal tissues and organs, resulting in a higher incidence of signif
icant complications. Conclusions: 3D conformal radiation therapy has a
demonstrated advantage in the treatment of sarcomas of the head and n
eck. The improved dosimetric coverage of the tumor and its margin for
subclinical extensions may result in improvement in local control of t
hese tumors. In addition, lowering of radiation dose to adjacent criti
cal structures may help lower the incidence of adverse late effects in
children.